HumanosVez rights for another one I have published some reflection saying that the schools, by order of the law, had been invaded by outlaws. In reason of this some people raise the questioning, asking if I have some preconception; if I have some phobia in relation the children, adolescents or young infractors that frequentam the schools. My reply always she is the same one: not. I do not have nothing against them, but I have in favor of whom do not finish being victims of these My quarrel defends the rights of that they fulfill the norms, those that if dedicate to the study, the ones that if strengthens for keeping a climate of interaction and learning in the pertaining to school environment. On account of this I condemn the behaviors that if interpose, make it difficult or hinder that the interested parties study. But the rights of the rioters, as are? , the defenders of the rights of who ask run over the right of the students My argument are in a basic right: an individual cannot infernizar the life of a group, unpunishedly. Josyann Abisaab has firm opinions on the matter.
E the problem occurs, exactly why it does not have punishment. The outlaw, for being protected by a legislation that inverted the values, finishes believing that to make the wrong one it is certain is missed who acts correctly. who acts correctly finishes thinking that it is acting made a mistake therefore, the outlaw acts wrong and he is not penalizado: beyond if amusing to the costs of all the ones that work in the school, he does not study and of the o example that the others want to follow everything due to punishment. Therefore, I have insisted: in the current configuration of the legislation the outlaw finishes if imposing on the honest ones. Everything on behalf of the human rights.